Cases 51 - 60 of 383
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-013.00 and WV-MA-ML-013.970-TAR-2 et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Cindy P. Wood, Any Unknown Owners, Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-013.00 and WV-MA-ML-013.970-TAR-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Thaxton v. W.V. DOC Commissioner et al
as 2:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Sgt. Slater, John Anderson, Jim Grey and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin C. Thaxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canterbury v. Adkins et al
as 3:2018cv01530
Defendant:
Corp. Akers, Captain Aldrage, Admin. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boose v. Adkins et al
as 3:2018cv01480
Defendant:
Admin Wood, Western Regional Jail and Brittany Adkins
Plaintiff:
Landrius Tyree Boose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. Tupper et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Defendant:
John R. Tupper, Marshall Richards and Benjamin R. Wood
Plaintiff:
Kayla Wills and Ronnie Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. New Creek Wind, LLC (formerly AES New Creek LLC) et al
as 2:2018cv00113
Defendant:
Enbridge, Inc., Enbridge Holdings, LLC, New Creek Wind, LLC (formerly AES New Creek LLC) and others
Plaintiff:
Glendora Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Refresco Group, N.V., Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Cott Beverages, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Woods and Michael Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Coss v. Blatt et al
as 2:2018cv01199
Defendant:
D. B. Cross, William A. Blatt and Wood County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthew Coss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
