Cases 61 - 70 of 242
Harris et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv03085
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Drescher and Thomas John Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woolsey v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
John Harry Woolsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01651
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER et al v. HOSTETTER et al
as 2:2013cv05081
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARKER, KRISTEN BARKER, WILLIAM B. CAREY, III and others
Defendant:
WILMER L. HOSTETTER, JOYCE L. HOSTETTER, KEYSTONE CUSTOM HOMES, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HUGH V ARCHER INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chrastka, Keith Petty, Eugene Roberson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03065
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRASTKA, KEITH PETTY, EUGENE ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00196
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Harris et al
as 3:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Mildred R Harris and John Harris
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
