Cases 61 - 70 of 169
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP v. EngagePoint, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01163
Petitioner:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
Respondent:
EngagePoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Jablonski Enterprises, Ltd. v. County of Nye, Nevada, et al
as 17-15400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JABLONSKI ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF NYE, NEVADA, SHEREE STRINGER, DEBBIE ORRICK and others
Rasmussen v. Holman et al
as 2:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
Augustus Julius Orrick Rasmussen
Defendant:
Sean M Holman and Louis M McAnany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latanyshyn v. Welkin, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maryanne Latanyshyn
Defendant:
Welkin LLC and Hamish Orrick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Butler et al v. Niles et al
as 1:2015cv04239
Plaintiff:
Denise Butler and Jimmy Davidson
Defendant:
Avery Niles, Mark Sexton , Sarah Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jablonski Enterprises, LTD v. Nye County et al
as 2:2015cv02296
Defendant:
Clayton P. Brust, Greg Ekins, GIS Land Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jablonski Enterprises, LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Google Inc. v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
as 3:2015mc00577
Petitioner:
Google Inc.
Respondent:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Google Inc. v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
as 3:2015mc80208
Petitioner:
Google Inc.
Respondent:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hassan A. Abbas, Esq. v. Orrick, Herrington Sutcliffe, LLP et al
as 1:2015cv01545
Plaintiff:
Hassan A. Abbas, Esq.
Defendant:
Orrick, Herrington Sutcliffe, LLP and Richard A. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Heller Ehrman LLP, et al v. Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
as 14-16318
Debtor:
In the Matter of: HELLER EHRMAN LLP
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELLER EHRMAN LLP, Liquidating Debtor
Defendant - Appellee:
ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
