Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at00845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramirez-Ramos v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jesus Angel Ramirez-Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miguel Angel Ramirez v. Vanessa Macias et al
as 5:2013cv01132
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Mario Macias Llamas, Vanessa Macias and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Ramirez
Miguel Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71776
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ramirez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08210
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Ramirez and Angel Ramirez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez Garcia et al v. Ridge C.C. at Reynosa Beneficiary, L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Ramirez Garcia and Banco J.P. Morgan, S.A.
Defendant:
Ridge C.C. at Reynosa Beneficiary, L.L.C.
Counter_claimant:
Ridge C.C. at Reynosa Beneficiary, L.L.C.
Counter_defendant:
Banco J.P. Morgan, S.A. and Miguel Angel Ramirez Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mendoza et al v. HoHoHo Express, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Mendoza , Angel Ramirez , Clayton E Holmes and others
Defendant:
HoHoHo Express, Inc. and Eric Ho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2013cv00190
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Ramirez-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McLeay v. Cuba et al
as 1:2012cv23326
Plaintiff:
Neil Francis McLeay
Defendant:
Cuba, Fidel Castro Ruz, Raul Castro Ruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
