Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Damien Sublett v. Justin Bryant, et al
as 16-6111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN T. BRYANT, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center, BRAD ADAMS, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center, JAMIE MORELAND, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center and others
Spotted Elk v. Department of Health et al
as 4:2016cv04019
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gregory Spotted Elk
Defendant:
Department of Health, Brad Adams and Eugene Regler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Young et al
as 4:2015cv04121
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Darin Young, Jennifer Wagner, Arthor Allcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Don Bottom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Monn, et al v. Gettysburg Area School Distri, et al
as 13-2730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MONN, ROBYN MONN, MICHAEL FAUTH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GETTYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES O'CONNOR, STEVEN LITTEN and others
Monn et al v. Gettysburg Area School District et al
as 1:2012cv02085
Plaintiff:
David Monn , Robyn Monn , Michael Fauth and others
Defendant:
Gettysburg Area School District , James O'Connor , Steven Litton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Weavel v. Thompson et al
as 4:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joe Don Weavel
Defendant:
LaDonna H. Thompson and Brad Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steve Beshear, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
