Cases 61 - 70 of 149
Marshall et al v. Burnley et al
as 6:2017cv01090
Plaintiff:
Krystal M. Marshall and Milton J. Davison
Defendant:
Benjamin Burnley, Jason Rauch, Keith Wallen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Redd v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
Terry Redd
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00659
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Matthew Killough and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eastman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chad Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr, GEO Group Inc, Dean Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. A+ Care Solutions, Inc., et al.
as 2:2017cv02045
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Woods
Defendant:
A+ Care Solutions, Inc. and Antonio White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Goldsmith v. Kim et al
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert Goldsmith
Defendant:
Kim, Jennifer Briscoe and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Coastal Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Julius Calvin Christopher
Defendant:
Coastal Bend Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions, Inc., GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc., et al
as 2:2016cv16551
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Avery Phillips
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunyan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02103
Plaintiff:
James M. Dunyan
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Douglas Bopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milione, D.C. P.C. v. Optumhealth Care Solutions, Inc
as 1:2016cv06591
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Milione, D.C. P.C.
Defendant:
Optumhealth Care Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
