Cases 61 - 70 of 383
USA v. Luis Hernandez-Alvidrez
as 21-10056
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS CARLOS HERNANDEZ-ALVIDREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DICKERSON v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
WARDEN CARLOS HERNANDEZ and Secretary ERIK HOOKS
Petitioner:
Mr. Jerome Andrew Dickerson and JEROME ANDREW DICKERSON
Respondent:
ERIK HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Sophia Feaster, M. Dula, Amy Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Randall Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machin v. United States Of America
as 1:2021cv20374
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez Machin
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez Camacho et al v. Salem Operating JV et al
as 6:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Galen C Franz, Brent L. Adkisson, Salem Operating JV and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfredo Guerrero Sanchez, Jose Isabel Guerrero Echeveste and Juan Carlos Hernandez Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Dawaune Ellis, II
Defendant:
Richard Anderson, Carlos Hernandez, Carlos (I) Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Anderson et al
as 1:2021cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dawaune Ellis, II
Defendant:
Carlos Hernandez, Richard Anderson and Richard (I) Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
DIR. NCDAC PRISONS TODD ISHEE, SGT. WILSON, AX CI. MEDICAL DEPT and others
Plaintiff:
DAMION MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin Lawing v. Carlos Hernandez
as 20-7821
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWIN CHRISTOPHER LAWING
Respondent / Appellee:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Superintendent
Gavino-Mariscal v. USA
as 4:2020cv00535
Petitioner:
Cruz Alonso Gavino-Mariscal and Carlos Hernandez-Fernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
