Cases 61 - 70 of 351
Pinion v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02178
Petitioner:
Armon Lewis Pinion
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Newborn v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02176
Petitioner:
Michael Newborn
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dwight Major v. Warden Craig Apker
as 13-7210
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT AVON MAJOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CRAIG APKER
Respondent:
WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS
Gurule v. Apker
as 4:2013cv00720
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Gurule
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02159
Petitioner:
Donald L. Green
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arey v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02149
Petitioner:
Randolph William Arey
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dubose v. Apker et al
as 5:2013hc02148
Petitioner:
Thomas Dubose
Respondent:
Craig Apker, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Florez v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03162
Plaintiff:
Raymond Florez
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Craig Apker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOREZ v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND FLOREZ
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., CRAIG APKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Apker
as 4:2013cv00636
Petitioner:
John L Williams
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
