Cases 61 - 70 of 1,184
Walter DrummondIn re: Walter Drummond
as 23-14021
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04768
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04767
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant:
WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON, FCI McKEAN FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HEAD, COMPOUND SUPERVISING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemmons v. Melody et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Nurse Melody, Gentner Drummond, Administrative Head of State Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vital Core Strategies
as 23-60599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Vital Core Strategies, Mike Ezell, Sheriff, individual and official capacity, Tyrone Nelson, Captain, individual and official capacity and others
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Emanuel v. Cooke et al
as 3:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Troy Jr. Emanuel and Troy Emanuel, Jr.
Defendant:
Cooke, David Drummond, William Gittere and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
