Cases 61 - 70 of 351
Kennemer v. Parker County, Texas
as 21-10467
Defendant / Appellee:
La Salle Southwest Corrections, Jack County, Texas, Tom Spurlock, Sheriff of Jack County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John David Kennemer
Bruce Robert Montague v. Eric D. Weber et al
as 2:2021cv03216
Defendant:
Eric D. Weber and Does 1-7
Plaintiff:
Bruce Robert Montague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orendorf v. Office of Behavioral Health et al
as 1:2021cv01000
Defendant:
James Purviance, Office of Behavioral Health, Forensic Community Bases Services and others
Plaintiff:
Trenton H Orendorf and Trenton Harrison Orendorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Aberdeen School District No 5 et al
as 3:2021cv05236
Plaintiff:
Mary Sanchez and Mary Hensley
Defendant:
Aberdeen School District No 5 and Jane and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVALL v. HULLINGS
as 2:2021cv06022
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE DAVALL
Defendant:
JOHN HULLINGS, JOHN DOES 1-7 and ABC CORPS 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marta Lyall v. Bank of America, et al
as 21-35079
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTA D. LYALL
DAVES v. UBER et al
as 2:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
HAAFIZAH DAVES
Defendant:
ABC CORPS, JOHN DOES, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2020cv03612
Defendant:
John Does 1-7, City of Aurora and Jane Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Daisy Baker, on her own behalf and as Administratrix of the Estate of David Baker and Daisy Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Keen et al
as 4:2020cv01654
Defendant:
Corrine Unknown, Megan Unknown, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2020cv01655
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, Jane Doe 1-7 and Unknown Dawn
Plaintiff:
Deangelo J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
