Cases 61 - 70 of 154
Moore v. Hopkins County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Moore, III
Defendant:
Hopkins County, Kentucky , Joe Blue , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Moore
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Doris Knox, et al v. City of Fresno, et al
as 16-16691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORIS RAY KNOX, JERRY WAYNE KNOX and JEREMY EDWARD MOORE, individually and as successor-in-interest to Veronica Lynn Canter, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation, EDWARD CHRISTOPHER LOUCHREN, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Fresno and DOUGLAS EDWARD COX, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Fresno
Moore v. United States Of America
as 2:2016cv14208
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Moore
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22118
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Moore
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Hopkins County Jail
as 4:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Moore, III
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. USA
as 1:2016cv00131
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Athey v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2016cv03105
Plaintiff:
Anthony Athey , Quentin Bertels , Sonia Boyd and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2016cv03347
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore and Natalie Moore
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Escapule
as 4:2016cv00101
Petitioner:
Anthony Edward Moore
Respondent:
Laura Escapule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
