Cases 61 - 70 of 2,335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Brown et al v. Suffolk County Police Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv06636
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Brown, Henry Mulligan and Chrispher Brandl
Defendant:
Suffolk County Police Dept., "Officers & Sgt. "etc", Phillips Osten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Maersk A/S et al
as 1:2023cv09177
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
MAERSK A/S trading as MAERSK LINE, M/V Maersk Eindhoven, her engines, tackle, boilers, etc., Maersk A/S doing business as Maersk Line and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1291 Maritime
Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. Jay Scotts Company
as 0:2023cv61978
Plaintiff:
Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay Scotts Company doing business as Planters ETC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Century Bank v. M/Y SUMMER 69 et al
as 0:2023cv61616
Plaintiff:
Century Bank
Defendant:
M/Y SUMMER 69, a 2003 130 Westport Motor Yacht Official No. 1143060, along with her boats, engines, boilers, tackle, equipment, apparel, furnishings, freights, and appurtenances, etc., M/V 689, a 2016 42 Scout 420 LXF Official No. 1261594, along with her boats, engines, boilers, tackle, equipment, apparel, furnishings, freights, and appurtenances, etc., M/Y SUMMER 69 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Foreclose Ship's Mortgage
Propst v. Williamsport, PA et al
as 4:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Stacey Propst, Sr., Erika Propst, Jah'sin Propst and others
Defendant:
Williamsport, Pa, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Adam Duffy
as 23-1950
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, an Indiana Company
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM C. DUFFY and LYDIA DUFFY
Defendant:
LAWN ETC., LLC, d/b/a Corrective Landscape Services, a North Carolina limited liability company
U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone Group Jamaica Co., LLC et al
as 1:2021cv09342
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, ETC. and U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
MATTONE GROUP JAMAICA CO., LLC, THE NEW YORK CITY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, City Of New York Environmental Control Board and others
Counter Defendant:
Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure
In re Settoon Towing
as 23-30578
Petitioner:
Settoon Towing, L.L.C., As the Alleged Owners and/or Owners Pro Hac Vice of the M/V Archie C. Settoon and the M/V Philomene P. Perera, along with all of their respective Cargo, Engines, Tackle, Gear, Appurtenances, etc. in Rem, Petitioning for Exoner, Energy Marine Leasing, L.L.C., As the Alleged Owners and/or Owners Pro Hac Vice of the M/V Archie C. Settoon and the M/V Philomene P. Perera, along with all of their respective Cargo, Engines, Tackle, Gear, Appurtenances, etc. in Rem, Petitioning for and Tala Marine, L.L.C., As the Alleged Owners and/or Owners Pro Hac Vice of the M/V Archie C. Settoon and the M/V Philomene P. Perera, along with all of their respective Cargo, Engines, Tackle, Gear, Appurtenances, etc. in Rem, Petitioning for Exonerati
Claimant:
Terrance M. Shelley, Terry's Oysters, Incorporated, Eglica Madjor and others
The Grand, LTD. et al v. Any and all persons having claims
as 4:2023cv02879
Petitioner:
The Grand, LTD. as Owner of the DERRICK BARGE MR. TWO HOOKS, its engines, gear, tackle, etc. in a Cause for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Claimant:
Any and all persons having claims arising out of the voyage of the MR. TWO HOOKS on or about October 4, 2022
Counter Defendant:
The Grand, LTD.
Cross Defendant:
Fugro USA Marine, Inc., Fugro (USA), Inc. and Fugro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
