Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Adams et al v. The City Of New York ,
as 1:2016cv03445
Plaintiff:
Violeta Hernandez, Jerome Adams, Mechelle Agard and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Departamento de Correccion y Rehabilitacion et al
as 3:2016cv01400
Plaintiff:
Obe E. Johnson
Defendant:
Departamento de Correccion y Rehabilitacion , Luis I. Muniz, Eignar Ramos-Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. USA
as 2:2015cv02577
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eduardo Garcia Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garcia-Cortez v. USA
as 2:2015cv02576
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eduardo Garcia-Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dianna Dodds v. City of Yorktown, Texas, et al
as 15-41573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DODDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF YORKTOWN, TEXAS, EDUARDO GARCIA and ALEX CAMPBELL
Romero et al v. City of Grapevine, Texas et al
as 3:2015cv03101
Plaintiff:
Martha Anjelica Romero , Eduardo Garcia , Keila Garcia and others
Defendant:
City of Grapevine, Texas , Eddie Salame and Robert Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Schubmehl et al v. Melngailis et al
as 1:2015cv06432
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schubmehl , Kevin Woods , Liana Felt and others
Defendant:
Sarma Melngailis, One Lucky Duck Holdings, LLC, Pure Food and Wine, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv03877
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Defendant:
Police Officers Does 1-2 John and New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G&G International Corp. et al v. Duran
as 3:2015cv01772
Plaintiff:
G&G International Corp. , Ruben Garcia-Sarraff and Eduardo Garcia-Cruz
Defendant:
Walter H. Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
