Cases 61 - 70 of 177
Ruoff Mortgage Company Inc v. Thomas et al
as 1:2018cv00353
Defendant:
Gregory Thomas and Michael Grove
Plaintiff:
Ruoff Mortgage Company, Inc. d/b/a Ruoff Home Mortgage and Ruoff Mortgage Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pencille v. Joyner
as 1:2018cv02904
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas Pencille
Respondent:
Aaron Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gough v. Batts
as 2:2018cv02541
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas Gough
Respondent:
Myron L. Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Applins (Griffin)
as 18-1969
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Clayton Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Griffin, AKA Meeshack and Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
Boatman et al v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2018cv04237
Plaintiff:
Eric Boatman and Carol Jarvis
Defendant:
Ramon McCalpine, Harvey Police Detective York, Robert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. Rinaldi et al
as 3:2018cv01018
Plaintiff:
Harold Sterling
Defendant:
City of Hartford , James Rovella , Mark Rinaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gough v. Batts
as 2:2018cv02363
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas Gough
Respondent:
Myron L. Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. United States of America
as 9:2018cv00430
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Applins (Thomas)
as 18-972
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Clayton Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
Gregory Thomas #13 v. United States of America
as 18-998
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gregory Thomas
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
