Cases 61 - 70 of 211
Munywe v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2021cv05102
Plaintiff:
Michael Muthee Munywe
Defendant:
Donald Holbrook, Leutenant, Melanie Rominee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Byerly v. USA, et al
as 21-55691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Defendant / Appellee:
ICS TELECOM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INMATE TELEPHONE SERVICE and others
WILLIAMS v. GLOBAL TEL & LINK CORPORATION ET AL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS and KIRBY STEWART
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND and GLOBAL TEL & LINK CORPORATION ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BYERLY v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2021cv10632
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION, UNITED STATES, CORRLINKS and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BYERLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byerly v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00864
Defendant:
ICS Telecom, United States, Corrlinks and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniel Carlos Garcia v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Scott Phillips, Ed Berakovich, Otis Sterling, III and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carlos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilgrim v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Erwin Pilgrim
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Global Tel Link Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Global Tel Link Corporation v. Benson Githieya, et al
as 20-90030
Respondent:
DARLENE BYERS, NELLIE LOCKETT and BENSON GITHIEYA
Petitioner:
GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION
Taylor v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2020cv01001
Defendant:
Hyatte, Leichty, Martin and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al
as 20-16813
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL TEL LINK, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, also named MCSO, CITY OF PHOENIX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
