Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Adrian Moon et al v. Kimberly Seibel et al
as 2:2015cv07501
Defendant:
Robert Barton, Robert Barton, J Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Damico Moon and Johnny Potter
PETERSON v. HAAK et al
as 5:2015cv04162
Plaintiff:
DARNELLA PETERSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW HAAK and INDEPENDENCE ANTIQUE BRICK CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Villery v. Garcia et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Villery
Defendant:
Edward Garcia, Todd Haak, David Crounse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Muathe v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 15-3019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC M. MUATHE
Defendant - Appellee:
FIFTH THIRD BANK, FIFTH THIRD HOLDINGS FUNDING LLC, FIFTH THIRD AUTO FUNDING CONDUIT LLC and others
Defendant:
PENDLETON AND SUTTON LLC, FLETCHER AUTO GROUP, TRANSUNION and others
Muathe v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 15-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK A. WERNER, LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. WERNER, THOMPSON COBURN LLP and others
Defendant:
EXPERIAN, PLC, REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, FLETCHER AUTO GROUP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC M. MUATHE
Moon v. Holland et al
as 1:2014cv01704
Plaintiff:
Adrian Moon
Defendant:
Kim Holland, R. Groves, C. Worland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haake et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22581
Plaintiff:
Marcia Haake and Francis Haake
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Haake v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21414
Plaintiff:
Marcia Haake
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
