Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Little v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Calhoun County, Kenneth Ne Smith and Calhoun County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2010at00021
Plaintiff:
James Little
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Rick Braziel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Little v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Little
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Rick Braziel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn Elliott Beckner v. United States et al
as 2:2008cv07504
:
, , and others
Defendant:
DOES, Judge Susan Johnson, Judge Susan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LITTLE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86058
Plaintiff:
JAMES LITTLE
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Peter Little v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 08-16531
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER JAMES LITTLE
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
James Little v. Thomas Knapp, et al
as 08-1910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS KNAPP, MEARL J. JUSTUS, ST. CLAIR COUNTY JAIL and others
Little v. Ressler Hardwoods & Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
James Little and James Little
Defendant:
Ressler Hardwoods & Flooring, Inc., Keith Ressler, Kenneth Ressler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-7090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hunter et al v. Knapp et al
as 3:2007cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jason Hunter, Billy Ford Bey and James Little
Defendant:
Thomas Knapp, Mearl J Justus, St. Clair County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
