Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Michael Wayne Hughes v. The People
as 5:2014cv01745
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Hughes
Respondent:
The People
Nokota Packers, Inc. v. Agri-Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2014mi00094
Plaintiff:
Nokota Packers, Inc.
Defendant:
Agri-Sales, Inc. and Michael Z. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Hughes v. Borkowski et al
as 1:2014cv05622
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hughes
Defendant:
Matthew Borkowski, Scott Kravitz and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lammon v. Galveston Independent School District by and Through the Board of Trustees of Galveston Independent School District et al
as 4:2014cv01853
Plaintiff:
Debra Lammon
Defendant:
Galveston Independent School District by and Through the Board of Trustees of Galveston Independent School District, John W Ford, Linda Hornbeck Dolfi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sanchez v. Hughes
as 5:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Herlinda L. Sanchez
Defendant:
Michael A. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Hughes et al v. BMW of North America LLC
as 4:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Dante' Hughes and Angela Ann Hughes
Defendant:
BMW of North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nokota Packers, Inc. v. Agri-Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nokota Packers, Inc.
Defendant:
Agri-Sales, Inc. and Michael Z. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
United States v. Hughe
as 12-3331
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. HUGHES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
