Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Mary Garcia
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Garcia
as 13-8066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JACQUELINE M. GARCIA, AKA Jacqueline Marie Garcia, AKA Jacqueline Molina
USA v. Ashley Perez
as 13-50574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ASHLEY MARIE PEREZ, also known as Ashley Marie Garcia, also known as Ashley M. Perez, also known as Ashley Marie Magana Perez
Maurice Muhammad v. Jennifer Garcia, et al
as 13-16301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER GARCIA, Sacramento Detective, MARY GARCIA, Officer, THOMAS MCGEE, Officer and others
Garcia v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00768
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mary Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v Commissioner, SSA
as 6:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mary Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alan Garcia, et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 13-80032
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ALAN GARCIA, MARY GARCIA, TOMMY CALHOUN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Muhammad v. U.C. Davis Police Police Dpt. et al
as 2:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Maurice Muhammad
Defendant:
U.C. Davis Police Department, Jennifer Garcia, Mary Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juettemeyer v. Communications Workers of America et al
as 5:2012cv01192
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Carolyn Behymer, Chad Carloss and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Juettemeyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
