Cases 61 - 70 of 370
United States v. Clinton Ross, II
as 22-1660
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clinton Earl John Ross, II, also known as Matthew James McCallister
Bailey v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Bailey
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc., Eric Artz and Anthony Truesdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Allen v. Mohamed et al
as 3:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Allen
Defendant:
Khaled Mohamed, Aarti Gupta, Yale New Haven Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Allen
Defendant:
Troy Jordan and Yale New Haven Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.K.Z. v. Jones et al
as 6:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
A.K.Z.
Defendant:
James Martin Jones and Matthew James Heltsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bonner v. Brink's Incorporated et al
as 5:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Bonner, Jr.
Defendant:
Brink's Incorporated, Brink's Capital, LLC, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frame v. Brink's Incorporated et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Collin Frame
Defendant:
Brink's Incorporated, Brink's Capital, LLC, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matthew James Choy v. United States Southern District of Florida, et al
as 22-10273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES CHOY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, BOP, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Vandall v. England et al
as 5:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Vandall
Defendant:
Matthew James England, Brink's, Incorporated, Brink's Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
