Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Charles Hinton v. Michael Henderson
as 11-6096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. HENDERSON, PETER S. GILCHRIST, III, TERESA BROADWAY and others
Hinton v. Henderson et al
as 3:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Michael W. Henderson, Peter S. Gilchrist, Teresa Broadway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Henderson v. Mikki Peterick, et al
as 10-3158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael P. Henderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Mikki Peterick and Mille Lacs County Family Services
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv06144
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Rodney G Davis and Michael J Henderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Henderson v. Unknown Police Officer et al
as 0:2010cv03098
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Henderson
Defendant:
Unknown Police Officer and Bloomington, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Henderson
as 10-5675
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HENDERSON
Henderson v. Davis
as 1:2010cv00838
Petitioner:
Michael T. Henderson
Respondent:
B. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. Peterick et al
as 0:2009cv02149
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Henderson
Defendant:
Mikki Peterick and Mille Lacs Co. Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. W2 Enterprises, LLC et al
as 7:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
W2 Enterprises, LLC, Michael W. Henderson, Elizabeth Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
