Cases 61 - 70 of 1,113
Casolo v. Jennings et al
as 3:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Casolo
Defendant:
Z. A. Jennings, Michael Williams, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seppo v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Michael William Seppo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLIAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michael Brown v. Kamry Palmer, et al
as 23-2559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMRY PALMER and AUSTIN PECARD
Carneeda GarrisonIn re: Carneeda Garrison
as 23-12498
Petitioner:
In re: CARNEEDA GARRISON
Respondent:
ELIZABETH ANN GUERRANT, WHITNEY HARPER, J. MICHAEL WILLIAMS and others
Carl Long v. Jason Kander, et al
as 23-2706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Jason Kander, Jordan R. Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Anthony Long v. Jean Baker, et al
as 23-2703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Edward Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Jean Peters Baker, Jordan R. Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
