Cases 61 - 70 of 3,321
Mullins v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Lonn Mullins
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Molina v. Lake Erie Correctional Institution et al.
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carla Molina
Defendant:
Lake Erie Correctional Institution, CoreCivic, Inc., Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Mullins v. Novatech et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Avis Mullins
Defendant:
INC NOVATECH, CYNTHIA PETION, EDDY PETION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10273
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
MICHAEL RUDISILL, NANCY E. BRANDT, GINGER B. BOYD and others
Mullin v. County of Santa Clara, et al.
as 24-453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYGHE JAMES MULLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Burden (Kelvin Burden)
as 24-202
Defendant:
DAVID 4 BURDEN, ANTHONY BURDEN, WILLIE PREZZIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KELVIN BURDEN, Waffle, Uncle and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mullin v. San Jose Police Department
as 3:2023cv06110
Plaintiff:
Tyghe James Mullin
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedar Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 24-1063
Petitioner:
CEDAR COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ROGER L. MULLINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
