Cases 61 - 70 of 84
PAPI et al v. TOWN OF GORHAM et al
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAPI and JOHN J PAPI LLC
Defendant:
TOWN OF GORHAM, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN COUNCIL, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08122
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randle v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Charles Randle
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Bruce Rauner, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Papy's Foods, Inc. v. Deko International Co., Ltd
as 4:2016cv01533
Plaintiff:
Papy's Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Deko International Co., Ltd
Counter_claimant:
Deko International Co., Ltd
Counter_defendant:
Papy's Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Djeme v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05445
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Papis Djeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carmona v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04517
Plaintiff:
Michael Carmona
Defendant:
City Of New York, Evan Marro, Anthony Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Acevedo-Hernandez
as 15-1763
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL ACEVEDO-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Papi, a/k/a Napo
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Papi's Mexican Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00758
Plaintiff:
Benefit Music, Broadcast Music, Inc., Coral Reefer Music and others
Defendant:
Julia M Gomez and Papi's Mexican Cuisine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05981
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05873
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
