Cases 61 - 70 of 1,035
Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Davis v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution, LLC
as 8:2022cv00663
Defendant:
Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution, LLC and Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Earvin DavisIn re: Earvin Davis
as 22-1149
Petitioner:
In re: EARVIN R. DAVIS
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Acting Warden
Davis #227488 v. Lambros et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Earvin R. Davis #227488
Defendant:
James P. Lambros, Michael F. Gadola, Stephen Borrello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Davis #227488 v. Horton
as 2:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Earvin R. Davis #227488
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OWENS v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2021cv04815
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS, JR
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, J SANTIAGO, J ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East
as 21-60864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chakakhan R. Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Davis v. USA
as 4:2021cv00792
Petitioner:
Michael R. Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
