Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Staal v. Tisch et al
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jared Staal
Defendant:
Andrew H. Tisch, Ronald J. Packard, Craig R. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND, et al v. BARRETT, et al
as 1:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND and BRYN CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
KATE R. BARRETT, CHARLES BLACKMON, NATHAN DUGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Barrett
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARRETT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45461
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BARRETT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARRETT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35836
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BARRETT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Canter v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2011cv00918
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Canter, III
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley , Ragena Benjamen, Gary D. Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Homeland Vinyl Products v. Barrett et al
as 2:2011cv00328
Plaintiff:
Homeland Vinyl Products
Defendant:
Vance C. Barrett , Melanie R. Barrett , Scott R. Petersen and others
Counter_claimant:
Marilyn J. Petersen , Melanie R. Barrett , Scott R. Petersen and others
Counter_defendant:
Homeland Vinyl Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. Santillan et al
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Gabriel H.S. Baldwin
Defendant:
M. Santillan, B. Aquinaldo, R. Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayle R. Barrett v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
Gayle R Barrett
Defendant:
Bayou City Auction, Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
