Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Approximately 1439 Sabre Defence Industries M16 A2, A3, and A4 5.56 caliber machine guns et al
as 1:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 1439 Sabre Defence Industries M16 A2, A3, and A4 5.56 caliber machine guns, Approximately 538 Manroy XR16 5.56 caliber machine guns, Approximately 124 Sabre Defence Industries XR16 5.56 caliber machine guns and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016hc02235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Ramos-Hernandez v. USA
as 5:2016cv00558
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cosme Ramos-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brandt v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Sherri Ramos Brandt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Overton v. Florida Veterans Affairs Medical Center et al
as 5:2015ct03211
Plaintiff:
Herbert Overton
Defendant:
Florida Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Flakenburg Road Jail, V. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBADILLA v. CORDERO
as 1:2014cv00205
Respondent:
JOSE DE JESUS SOSA CORDERO
Petitioner:
ROSA RAMOS BOBADILLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
