Cases 61 - 70 of 166
EDWARDS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
RICHARD YOUNG, PATTIE GORGAN, BEST BUY ROOFING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Povoski v. LaValley et al
as 9:2011cv00120
Defendant:
R. Carine, Kevin Hart, Daniel Clancy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Povoski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv02102
Defendant:
NEWTON ALLEN, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re: Richard Young
as 14-4783
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD YOUNG
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY
HERZ v. PFENNINGER et al
as 1:2014cv02001
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, SUSAN BROOKS, MICHAEL DELPH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Young v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05154
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, McDonnell Douglas Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Young v. USA
as 3:2014cv00546
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shane Hardy v. Stanley Caradine, et al
as 14-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY CARADINE, Doctor, Former Dentist, Western Illinois Correctional Center, LEONTA JACKSON, Warden, Former Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center, RICHARD YOUNG, Warden, Former Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center and others
VAUGH v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2014cv04982
Plaintiff:
ANDREW VAUGH
Defendant:
RICHARD YOUNG and UNLIMITED ROOFING AND CONCRETE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
