Cases 61 - 70 of 358
QUEEN v. DIETRICH et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Defendant:
S. D. BROWN, D. J. BENOTTI, K. A. DIETRICH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL QUEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEKsystems, Inc. v. Ambar et al
as 8:2021cv00942
Defendant:
Deborah Ambar, Startfinder and S&D Solutions, LLC doing business as Startfinder
Plaintiff:
TEKsystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salami v. B S D Food, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv02704
Defendant:
B S D Food, LLC doing business as Bagel D'Lox and Nelson Buchinger
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Salami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Gordon-Bey v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Micah J. Gordon-Bey and Micah J. Gordon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden S. D. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leninger v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100
Plaintiff:
Mari Leninger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Weaver v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Warden S. D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALKA et al v. ULTA BEAUTY, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv20445
Defendant:
REDKEN 5TH AVENUE NYC, LLC, XYZ RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 1-10, DEF COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BALKA and CHERYL BALKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MERIS v. WILSON et al
as 1:2020cv01109
Defendant:
DETECTIVE S. D. BROWN, CORPORAL A. B. MARTIN and JUDGE EDWIN WILSON
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
eBeauty Sales, LLC v. Stanko et al
as 1:2020cv04719
Defendant:
Brianna Stanko, L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. and L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
eBeauty Sales, LLC doing business as Premier Look
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
