Cases 61 - 70 of 100
SWARTZ v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2025cv03537
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SWARTZ
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Easley v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2025cv01413
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson-Lee, Kevin Shepard, Major Stuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Swartz v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2025cv02326
Plaintiff:
Stanley L Swartz
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Michael Swartz
as 25-3491
Petitioner:
ALFRED A. JOHNSON, SR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden
In re: John Coleman
as 25-3484
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN C. COLEMAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. The Barry R. Kirshner Wildlife Foundation et al
as 2:2025cv01847
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
The Barry R. Kirshner Wildlife Foundation, Roberta Kirshner, Sean Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Coleman v. Swartz
as 5:2025cv01360
Petitioner:
John C. Coleman
Respondent:
Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swartz v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3907
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swartz v. Social Security Adminsitration
as 4:2025cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark D Swartz
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
