Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Murphy v. Gulf of Mexico et al
as 3:2015cv00663
Defendant:
Gulf Oil Spilled, Gulf of Mexico and The White House
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Calumet Lubricate et al
as 3:2015cv00609
Defendant:
Calumet Lubricate and Shreveport Regional Airport
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Gulf Oil Spilled et al
as 3:2015cv00592
Defendant:
Camtrak Chemical Emergency, Gulf Oil Spilled, Kansas City Southern Rail Road and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston et al v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Berlin et al
as 4:2013cv40115
Plaintiff:
Tamara Z Johnston and Archibald Johnston
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of Berlin , Emerson Chandler , Linda Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Sandles v. Barbara McQuade, et al
as 13-1746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA LYNN MCQUADE, LYNN DODGE, WILLIAM L. WOODARD and others
Sandles v. McQuade et al
as 2:2013cv10663
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Barbara McQuade , Lynn Dodge , William L. Woodard and others
Sandles v. Batista et al
as 2:2012cv11773
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Andrew Batista, George C Steeh, Doug Smith and others
Murphy v. Home Depot USA Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00282
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc and Sunterrace Casual Furniture Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinkal et al v. City of Hamilton et al
as 9:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Pinkal and Nadine Pinkal
Defendant:
City of Hamilton , Nic Painter, Stacy McElderry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Virgin Mobile USA et al
as 8:2011cv01656
Defendant:
Jeff Auman, BBVA, BNP Paribas and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
