Cases 61 - 70 of 153
WEBB-EL
as 1:2017cv01111
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRYANT WEBB-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCreary et al v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jusamuel Rodriguez McCreary , Richard C. Anamanya and Joseph R. Coppola
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., John Dignam and Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Clark v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Clark, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas Watson, Jeffrey Rendon, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARATOV v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv03775
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MIKHAYLOVICH BARATOV
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, RAND BEERS, JOHN DOE #01 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SHORTRIDGE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00226
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
KELLY SHORTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gilbert-Bey v. Kane et al
as 5:2017ct03128
Plaintiff:
Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Defendant:
Thomas R Kane, Donna C. Smith, Candice Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MELENDEZ v. JULIAN et al
as 2:2017cv00202
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
ALEX A. MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LYTTLE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00200
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
