Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Jenkins v. McNeil Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jenkins v. Wright et al
as 9:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins
Defendant:
Lester Wright and Dr. Vadlamudi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. James Jenkins, Jr.
as 09-2325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James William Jenkins, Jr., also known as Diamond
NORDHUS et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANNA F. NORDHUS , FRANCIS A NORDHUS , CORNELIUS FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
William Jenkins v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing C, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-87413
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining Manufacturing C
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins
BAILEY v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2008cv04860
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Respondent:
F. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JAY WILLIAMS JENKINS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF HON. TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-30960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Jenkins v. United States
as 08-2186
Movant - Appellant:
James William Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Garden City Boxing Club Inc v. Bar One et al
as 2:2007cv00797
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club Inc
Defendant:
Bar One, William Jenkins, III and Thomas N Howell
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
JENKINS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64588
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JENKINS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
