Cases 71 - 80 of 51,406
Brisbon-Harris v. Covidien LP et al
as 0:2024cv04529
Plaintiff:
Ross Brisbon-Harris
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Gonzaga v. State of Nevada NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv02353
Defendant:
Jennifer Nash, Gabriela Najera, Tarnishia Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Grissel A. Gonzaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Shaw et al
as 2:2024cv04277
Defendant:
Harry Shaw, III, Harry Shaw, V, The Shaw-Davis Company and others
Plaintiff:
Adam C Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Ms. Lakes
as 4:2024cv04969
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, Sgt. Lee, Ms. Lakes and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Ahmoud Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-7594
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, WILLIAM GITTERE, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Delgen Foye v. Scott Harris, et al
as 24-5283
Plaintiff:
Delgen Foye
Defendant:
Supreme Court of the United States, Clayton R. Higgins, Jr. and Scott S. Harris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harris v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02338
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Latisha Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
McKenzie et al v. High Point Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2024at01588
Plaintiff:
Bradley McKenzie and Allison Mckenzie
Defendant:
High Point Logistics LLC and Anthony Ray Harrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
