Cases 71 - 80 of 4,929
Mateo-Juan de Francisco, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1897
Petitioner:
PETRONA MATEO-JUAN DE FRANCISCO, LORENZO ELIAS FRANCISCO-MATEO and ANGEL ESTUARDO FRANCISCO-MATEO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Lorenzo Williams
as 24-1657
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lorenzo Williams
HAFEZ v. VIDINO et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
FARID HAFEZ
Defendant:
LORENZO VIDINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PROGRAM FOR EXTREMISM AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lanfair v. Siebel et al
as 3:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Justin Lanfair
Defendant:
Thomas Siebel, Edward Abbo, David Barter and others
Phillips v. Rose et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Timothy Rose, Lorenzo Emilio and 10th Judicial District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Salami
as 3:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Crystal Martinez
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Salami, . Lorenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES L.P., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyer v. Sparks et al
as 3:2024cv05211
Plaintiff:
S Marie Meyer
Defendant:
Lorenzo Sparks and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
