Cases 71 - 80 of 925
Vega v. Cramer
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04855
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cramer et al
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
William Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel W. Cramer and Hazen Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
CRAMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
CODY CRAMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRAMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
ERIKA URSULA CRAMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shell v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00040
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Cramer et al
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Corey Mitchell and Correy Mitchell
Defendant:
Cramer and Meredith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
PETER EUGENE CRAMER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
