Cases 71 - 80 of 1,221
SPRINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16116
Plaintiff:
DANA SPRINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Springer v. Tulsack, LLC
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Haylie Springer
Defendant:
Tulsack, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SPRINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14048
Plaintiff:
JOHN SPRINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPRINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11695
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SPRINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Julian Lewis Sanders & Associates LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Julian Lewis Sanders & Associates LLC, Candice Springer, Julian Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Springer et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 3:2023cv05015
Plaintiff:
Randolph Springer, Jennifer Springer and K-RAC
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Stone County Missouri, Alan M. Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Petitioner:
Levi Gary Springer
Respondent:
Harold Clarke, Rick White and Office of the Virginia State Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springer v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Levi Gary Springer
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Florance v. Carol Barnett, et al
as 23-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES W. FLORANCE and CHARLES FLORANCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL C. BARNETT, JOSE R. ESPADA, THOMAS M. EVERETT and others
TURNER v. JULIAN LEWIS SANDERS & ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02380
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
JULIAN LEWIS SANDERS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, CANDICE SPRINGER, JULIAN SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
