Cases 71 - 80 of 98
VAZQUEZ v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
LINETTE VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES F. WITTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-16546
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDRE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv02605
Petitioner:
Samuel Andre Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Demond Jackson
as 12-7794
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEMOND ANDRE JACKSON, a/k/a D.J.
Thorne v. Huntington Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv06280
Plaintiff:
H. C. Thorne, Jr.
Defendant:
Huntington Police Dept., J. R. Goodman, Andre Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Griffin v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Richard Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04772
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01336
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as OHN/5:12-cv-01336
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
