Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv02655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BORELLI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39323
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. BORELLI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
XL Spec Ins Co v. Torchio Brothers Inc, et al
as 10-1950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
XL SPEC INS CO
Defendant - Appellee:
TORCHIO BROTHERS INC, GREGORY V. TORCHIO, VINCENT A. TORCHIO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD T. BALDI and DOREEN RIORDAN SARAMA
Respondent - Appellee:
BORELLI AGENCY INC
SABBAGH et al v. CITY OF HACKENSACK et al
as 2:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
BASHAR SABBAGH and UNITED DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICA, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF HACKENSACK, STEVEN LOIACONO, PETER J. CAPONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buckholtz v. Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2009cv06037
Plaintiff:
Meagan Buckholtz
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, James T. Beall, Donald F. Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buckholtz v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2009cv06037
Plaintiff:
Meagan Buckholtz
Defendant:
Santa Clara County , James T. Beall, Donald F. Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borelli v. Lundquist
as 2:2009cv01018
Petitioner:
Jason R Borelli
Respondent:
Tim Lundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
