Cases 71 - 80 of 175
Hochstrasser v. Broadspire Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
Kathy Litton Hochstrasser
Defendant:
Broadspire Services, Inc. and Capinvad, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Dimas v. Frankcrum 9, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Juan Dimas
Defendant:
Frankcrum 9, Inc. , Marine Contracting Group, Inc. , American Home Assurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901 Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lusczki et al v. Cassens Transport Company et al
as 2:2012cv14608
Plaintiff:
Harry Lusczki and Ronald Beauchamp
Defendant:
Cassens Transport Company, Broadspire Services, Incorporated, Crawford & Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012at00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POLHILL v. WILKES et al
as 2:2012cv05354
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. POLHILL
Defendant:
KATHY WILKES , WORKNET OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL INC. and BROADSPIRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Meduty v. Georgia Department of Administrative Services et al
as 1:2012cv03240
Plaintiff:
Amun-Ra Hotep Ankh Meduty
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Administrative Services , Lisa Pratt , Broadspire Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. Master-Bilt, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Chism
Defendant:
Master-Bilt, Inc., Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and Broadspire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
