Cases 71 - 80 of 23,682
McDermott v. Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc.
as 1:2024cv03785
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Davis v. Kirk et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Cory J. Davis
Defendant:
Alan S. Kirk, Ashley Scott, Kari Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
John Bradley White
Defendant:
Cheri Pilkington, Christie Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Luis Garza
as 24-4262
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS BRADLEY GARZA, a/k/a Brad
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Volynets v. Bradley County et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Roxana Volynets
Defendant:
Bradley County, City of Cleveland, Tennessee and Willie Espinoza, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott (PS) v. CJC et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
CJC, El Paso County and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY WAYNE MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
