Cases 71 - 80 of 374
City of Pittsburgh v. FCC, et al
as 19-72880
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Shanda Harris v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 19-3441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANDA HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, GEORGE SATLER, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
City of Pittsburgh v. FCC, et al
as 19-3478
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DEPT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS, DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS CORP CONSTRUCTORS and ANASTASIOS ERNEST SMALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeever v. Singas
as 19-2079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor McKeever
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Nassau, Police Officer John Doe #1, Nassau County Police Officer, N.Y., Brritany R. Guerrier, Assistant D.A., Nassau County, N.Y. and others
ALDRED v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv00838
Defendant:
ACTING CHIEF OF POLICE REGINA MCDONALD, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, OFFICER LOGAN HANLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALDRED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
McKeever v. Singas, et al.
as 2:2019cv01756
Defendant:
Patrick Delaney, Police Officer John Doe #2, County of Nassau, New York and others
Plaintiff:
Victor McKeever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRAMER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv00539
Defendant:
SHIRLEY EPPERSON, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM PEDUTO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2019cv00617
Defendant:
DAVID LINCOLN, JOHN DOE #1, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
