Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Garrett et al v. Martin et al
as 1:2016cv01372
Plaintiff:
Lamario Garrett , Curtis Glass, III , Cenisha Glass and others
Defendant:
George N. Martin , Exel, Inc. , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Fields v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv13895
Plaintiff:
Kativia D. Fields
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wright v. Fields, et al
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Wright
Defendant:
D. Fields and C. Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv03252
Petitioner:
Emanual D Fields
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
J D Fields & Company Inc v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Company et al
as 1:2015mc00017
Plaintiff:
J D Fields & Company Inc
Defendant:
Nucor-Yamato Steel Company and Nucor Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Nucor-Yamato Steel Company
Counter_defendant:
J D Fields & Company Inc
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Mid-America Foundation Supply Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Emanual Fields v. Nelms, et al
as 15-10538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANUAL D. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE NELMS and BILL HILL, District Attorney
Fields v. Chicago Public Schools et al
as 1:2015cv04581
Plaintiff:
Gloria D Fields
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools and Chad P Weiden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 2:2015cv01271
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Fields
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Nelms et al
as 3:2015cv00879
Plaintiff:
Emanual D Fields
Defendant:
NFN Nelms and Bill Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
