Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Ballinger et al v. Citizens Memorial Health Care Foundation et al
as 4:2010cv00737
Plaintiff:
Cristal Ballinger and H. R. B.
Defendant:
Citizens Memorial Healthcare Foundation, Rahul Kapur, Butterfield Park Pediatrics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. City of Fort Worth, Texas
as 4:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Ric Clark , David Ellis and Weldon Norman
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Estep, et al
as 10-1295
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
AL ESTEP, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blood et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
as 3:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Blood , Sammy Abdeljawwad , Suhail Abdeljawwad and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blood et al v. Mortley
as 3:2010xc00669
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Blood, Sammy Abdeljawwad, Suhail abdeljawwad and others
Receiver:
Allie Hampton
Respondent:
Trina Mortley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Brown v. Thorton, et al
as 10-11473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
THORTON, CO II, TORINO, Nurse, DONAHUE, Nurse and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Souffrant v. Ellis
as 1:2009cv23183
Plaintiff:
Avery Souffrant
Defendant:
David Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Bynum v. FNU Slagel, et al
as 09-6138
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY J. BYNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
FNU SLAGEL, FNU BOWMAN, DAVID ELLIS, Chief Psychologist, F.C.I. Beckley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
