Cases 71 - 80 of 581
Larry Klayman v. Infowars, LLC, et al
as 22-11230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
INFOWARS, LLC, FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, ALEX E. JONES and others
(PC) Jones v. Loterstein et al
as 2:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Edward David Jones
Defendant:
Mariana Loterstein, Nay Aung, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
DAVID JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES and SWEENEY v. HENDRIX
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
DAVID JONES and CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Industrial Structures, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Industrial Structures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Yang v. Sensenig
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Cai Feng Yang
Defendant:
Lester Sensenig and Lester N. Sensenig
Not Classified By Court:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Higgins et al v. Haubert et al
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Connor Higgins and David Jones
Defendant:
Grace L Haubert, Hertz Corporation and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
William David Jones
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Defense Logistics Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
United States of America v. Burrell (Durell Guy)
as 22-421
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burrell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Gerard Bass, AKA Roddo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Durell Guy
Jones v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 9:2022cv80241
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
