Cases 71 - 80 of 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cagle v. Cundiff et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tenisha Cagle
Defendant:
Officer Cundiff, Officer Johnson, Thomas Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monzon v. Welch et al
as 7:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Melissa Welch, Jeremiah Fitz, Jr. and A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. David Robinson
as 23-6618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON and DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, VADOC, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A, RD, Dietician, VADOC and PAUL OHAI, MD, Treating Medical Practitioner, DWCC
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Dameron, Tremayne, Kimberly Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Tremayne Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVID ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper v. Kings County et al
as 1:2023at00517
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Harper
Defendant:
Kings County, David Robinson and J. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Kings County, et al.
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Harper
Defendant:
Kings County, David Robinson and J. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
