Cases 71 - 80 of 706
Robinson v. Robinson
as 3:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mallet Robinson
Defendant:
Robby David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
USA v. David Robinson, Jr.
as 23-12551
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ROBINSON, JR.
(PC) Harper v. Kings County, et al.
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Harper
Defendant:
Kings County, David Robinson and J. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamison v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
David Robinson, Natarcha Gregg, M.S.A, RD and Paul Ohia, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. David Robinson
as 23-6618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON and DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, VADOC, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A, RD, Dietician, VADOC and PAUL OHAI, MD, Treating Medical Practitioner, DWCC
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02615
Petitioner:
DAVID ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Tremayne Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
