Cases 71 - 80 of 611
Branham v. Alen Park, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12341
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel-Lee Branham and Jacob Branham
Defendant:
Alen Park, City of, Chris Egan, Janet Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CREECH v. DAILY et al
as 1:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE CREECH
Defendant:
KEVIN DAILY and SHAWN SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Burmeister
as 22-50819
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Burmeister, also known as Daniel Burmeister
Moore, et al. v. The City of Bonners Ferry, et al.
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Moore and Karen Moore
Defendant:
City of Bonners Ferry, Brian Zimmerman, Martin Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharon Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09945
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00850
Plaintiff:
Acosta, Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BERG v. TRICE et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE BERG
Defendant:
CAPTAIN TONY TRICE, SGT BILL LAVENDAR, ASHLEY GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA HUSS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
