Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Howard v. Norris et al
as 4:2008cv03613
Plaintiff:
Cherie Howard
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Max Mobley, Loftus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04061
Plaintiff:
Donald Anderson and Alicia Anderson
Defendant:
The City of New York, City, AMEC Construction Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Canada v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Yolonda J Canada
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Donald Anderson, James Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. State of California, et al
as 2:2008cv00387
Petitioner:
Irvin Donald Anderson
Respondent:
State of California and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. State of California, et al
as 1:2008cv00286
Petitioner:
Irvin Donald Anderson
Respondent:
State of California and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
as 2:2007cv67447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ADAMS, STANLEY AGACHINSKI, MARIO AGNES and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELEC CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Pryor-Kendrick v. Deen et al
as 1:2007cv00004
Defendant:
Jeff Deen, Michael Copeland, Jeffry H McLain and others
Plaintiff:
Alisha Pearson, Alisha Stroud, Gabby Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
