Cases 71 - 80 of 1,770
United States of America v. $51,220.00 in United States Currency et al
as 6:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$51,220.00 in United States Currency and Firearm
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Fort, et al v. Grisham, et al
as 23-2167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY FORT, NEW MEXICO SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WE THE PATRIOTS, INC. and DENNIS SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, in her official capacity only, PATRICK M. ALLEN, in his official capacity only, JASON R. BOWIE, in his official capacity only and others
Miller, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, WENDY HAUFFEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in their official capacity, ALLISON MENDOZA, In their official capacity, BRENT ORRICK, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms and others
Purcell v. City of New York
as 23-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROXANNE PURCELL, Estate of Garland Tyree Jr.
Plaintiff:
K.A.B. JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt. ANTHONY LISI, Shield #4584, Det. SHAWN MCLAUGHLIN, Shield #7640 and others
Defendant:
COLLEEN KAVANAGH, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, JAMES HAYES, Lt. Fire Department of N.Y. Engine 158 and others
Joshua McCoy v. ATF
as 23-2085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA CLAY MCCOY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class, TYLER DALTON MCGRATH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class, IAN FLETCHER SHACKLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a Class and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN MICHAEL DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Debbie Millwood v. Christopher Labno, et al
as 23-2980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBBIE MILLWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LABNO, individually and in his capacity as an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, TWO UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Jack Graham, III v. Steve Albro
as 23-2064
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACK H. GRAHAM, III, d/b/a Kathye's Jewelry and Pawn Shop
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE ALBRO, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Bencivenga Corporation d/b/a OFM Corporation et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 4:2023cv03887
Plaintiff:
Bencivenga Corporation d/b/a OFM Corporation
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Merrick Garland, Steven M. Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mark Johnson Blount, I v. United States, et al
as 23-3245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Jerome Johnson Blount, I
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, in his official and individual capacities, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, as agency of the United States of America and others
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
